About

This site is a browseable, status-annotated index of graph-theory conjectures. It combines the graph theory category of the Open Problem Garden with conjectures extracted from recent arXiv papers by a curated set of graph theorists.

A third, small corpus holds the items of Appendix A ("Unsolved Problems") of Bondy and Murty's Graph Theory (Springer GTM 244, 2008; French edition by F. Havet, 2025) that neither of the two main corpora covered. Each such page says which nearby records exist and where in the book the item appears.

A separate automated proof-attack workstream has flagged 23 arXiv-extracted items as ill-posed in the form supplied to the model. These diagnostics are displayed alongside, and never replace, the literature-review status.

A handful of further conjectures are added by hand because they are the subject of a research workstream under problems/ in the repository but appear in none of the corpora above (source badge others); each such page links to its workstream.

The merged index contains 227 OPG problems, 768 arXiv-extracted conjectures, 38 Bondy–Murty appendix items and 1 other workstream conjecture. Each reviewed item is classified as open, partial, solved, disproved, or unclear. Separate ai-proved and ai-disproved labels identify model-generated arguments listed in the Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs README, rated CONFIRMED, and accompanied by a linked PDF. Results rated MINOR_GAPS are excluded. The same labels mark entries whose statement is settled by a manuscript of OpenAI's collection of model-generated mathematics (released 2026-10-06); 22 entries link such a manuscript, some only as partial progress. These labels do not claim peer review. The timeline shows 130 solved or disproved conjectures as horizontal intervals from first claimed year to proof or counterexample year.

Source & licence

All problem statements, attributions, and bibliographies are reproduced from openproblemgarden.org under the GNU Free Documentation License. Each OPG problem page links back to its canonical Open Problem Garden URL. arXiv-derived records link back to their source paper via the arXiv abstract page. The project code is MIT licensed; data derived from OPG remains under the GFDL.

How it was built

Stats

Review caveat

The status reviews are automated literature reviews with verified cited URLs. They are designed as a research aid and should be spot-checked before being used as definitive mathematical or bibliographic claims. Attack verdicts are unrefereed model self-reports. An ill-posed label is a diagnostic of the catalog statement supplied to the model, not a literature-review status or a peer-reviewed result.

Inspiration

Layout is inspired by Thomas Bloom's erdosproblems.com.