ε-restricted union cover for H-free graphs
Union cover variant (open problem) · arXiv:2105.07370
Status solved high confidence
The partition theorem stated in the source paper immediately gives the requested union cover, because every partition is a cover.
Cited literature (1)
-
The partition theorem stated in the source paper immediately gives the requested union cover, because every partition is a cover.
Reviewer notes. These status corrections report results attributed to existing papers or to the final source version. Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs located and checked the implication; it is not credited as the author of the result. Audit caveat: This assumes the catalog uses the same induced-H-free and ε-restricted definitions and the same dependence N=N(H,ε) as the quoted source.
Context
The authors note this as a statement midway between Theorem 1.3 (partition into weakly $\varepsilon$-restricted sets) and their main Theorem 1.4 (partition into $\varepsilon$-restricted sets). They remark that 'this variation does not seem to be easy, although it does not imply 1.4 as far as we know.'
Notes. Stated as a passing remark without a labelled environment; the authors signal it is open and non-trivial but do not explicitly phrase it as a conjecture or question.
Source paper
Strengthening Rodl's theorem
Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, Sophie Spirkl · 2022-08-03
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07370
PDF source