Primeness of Cayley graphs over finite rings
Question 4.28 · arXiv:2401.06062
Status solved high confidence
For |R|≥3, Theorem 4.35 already characterizes X_R as prime exactly when R is semisimple, is not a field, and has at most one Wedderburn factor isomorphic to F₂.
Cited literature (2)
-
For |R|≥3, Theorem 4.35 already characterizes X_R as prime exactly when R is semisimple, is not a field, and has at most one Wedderburn factor isomorphic to F₂.
-
Establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for p-unitary Cayley graphs over finite commutative rings to be prime (under mild conditions), addressing a related but more restricted variant of Question 4.28.
Reviewer notes. These status corrections report results attributed to existing papers or to the final source version. Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs located and checked the implication; it is not credited as the author of the result. Audit caveat: This uses the standard unitary Cayley graph of a finite unital ring; R = F₂ gives K₂, whose status depends on the small-graph convention.
Context
$X_R$ denotes the Cayley graph constructed from a finite ring $R$ using its group of units and a connection set derived from the ring structure. This question is the central driving question of Section 4, and is reduced first to the semisimple case (showing non-semisimple $R$ gives non-prime $X_R$) and then to a combinatorial question about tensor products of complete graphs.
Notes. This question appears to be answered within the paper via Theorem 4.35; it is posed as the key structural question leading to the main results.
Source paper
On prime Cayley graphs
Maria Chudnovsky, Michal Cizek, Logan Crew, Ján Mináč, Tung T. Nguyen, Sophie Spirkl, Nguyên Duy Tân · 2024-01-11
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06062