Unavoidable induced subgraphs of large treewidth

Question 1.1 · arXiv:2410.16495

arXiv Question high confidence— first stated 2026-02-18

Status disproved high confidence

A theorem of Alecu, Bonnet, Bureo Villafana, and Trotignon implies that every proper hereditary candidate obstruction family fails, so the only universal hereditary core is the tautological class of all graphs.

Cited literature (3)

  • Bogdan Alecu, Édouard Bonnet, Pedro Bureo Villafana, Nicolas Trotignon · arXiv preprint (v3, 1 Apr 2025) · arXiv:2502.14775

    A theorem of Alecu, Bonnet, Bureo Villafana, and Trotignon implies that every proper hereditary candidate obstruction family fails, so the only universal hereditary core is the tautological class of all graphs.

    Read the literature-status audit

  • Maria Chudnovsky, Sepehr Hajebi, Sophie Spirkl · arXiv preprint · arXiv:2506.05602

    Proves treewidth is polynomially bounded by clique number in hereditary classes that are theta-free and exclude line graphs of subdivisions of some wall, making partial progress toward the full characterization sought by Question 1.1.

  • Authors unconfirmed from fetch · arXiv preprint · arXiv:2507.06169

    Constructs layered-wheel-like graphs achieving high girth with bounded outerstring treewidth, providing a simpler approach to the obstruction class identified as the last barrier to a complete induced-subgraph/treewidth characterization; also disproves a conjecture of Trotignon.

Reviewer notes. These status corrections report results attributed to existing papers or to the final source version. Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs located and checked the implication; it is not credited as the author of the result. Audit caveat: Question 1.1 is open-ended; the negative resolution concerns the universal hereditary-core formulation, while restricted-class structure theory remains open.

Auto-reviewed 2026-09-01 with gpt-5.6-sol.

Question. What are the unavoidable induced subgraphs of graphs with large treewidth?

Context

This question is the central goal of the series of papers on induced subgraphs and tree decompositions. The answer is known when 'induced subgraphs' is replaced by 'subgraphs' or 'minors' via Robertson and Seymour's grid theorem, but the induced setting is more complex, requiring all basic obstructions (complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, subdivided walls, and their line graphs) as well as non-basic ones such as Pohoata-Davies graphs, occultations, and layered wheels.

Source paper

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions XVI. Complete bipartite induced minors
Maria Chudnovsky, Sepehr Hajebi, Sophie Spirkl · 2026-02-18
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16495